<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Elijah Burgher @ Shane Campbell</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chicagoartreview.com/2010/01/26/minireview-elijah-burgher-shane-campbell/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chicagoartreview.com/2010/01/26/minireview-elijah-burgher-shane-campbell/</link>
	<description>Chicago art criticism, news, select event listings, and more from Steve Ruiz &#38; friends.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 17:03:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Ruiz</title>
		<link>http://chicagoartreview.com/2010/01/26/minireview-elijah-burgher-shane-campbell/comment-page-1/#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Ruiz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 04:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoartreview.com/?p=1993#comment-94</guid>
		<description>I dunno, that content would be more of how I personally feel about the topic of discussion, its content, and not so much how the art is creating or encouraging that discussion, which I feel is more appropriate for a short-form review. For whatever reason I&#039;m comfortable here just pointing at the what the art is doing and saying and saving the talking for a private or more interactive setting - but I also see your point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dunno, that content would be more of how I personally feel about the topic of discussion, its content, and not so much how the art is creating or encouraging that discussion, which I feel is more appropriate for a short-form review. For whatever reason I&#8217;m comfortable here just pointing at the what the art is doing and saying and saving the talking for a private or more interactive setting &#8211; but I also see your point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hosefina</title>
		<link>http://chicagoartreview.com/2010/01/26/minireview-elijah-burgher-shane-campbell/comment-page-1/#comment-93</link>
		<dc:creator>hosefina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 03:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoartreview.com/?p=1993#comment-93</guid>
		<description>able to mark out a wide space for discussion, even beyond the almost certainly terminal topic of gay sorcerers.

then do it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>able to mark out a wide space for discussion, even beyond the almost certainly terminal topic of gay sorcerers.</p>
<p>then do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
